A systematic review, and where possible a meta-analysis of the results, is regarded as the highest level of evidence in respect to a specific subject. The process of conducting a systematic review is not an easy process. Most confuse this with a literature review of a topic, but the latter is far from the truth. Moreover, to evaluate a clinical topic is difficult and full of hidden problems that impact the conclusions of this high-level review. The purpose of this talk is to inform the attendees what this process entails and what the outcome provides us in respect to clinical application.
Learning Objectives:
After this session, attendees will be able to:
Understand the process of conducting a systematic review.
Distinguish the systematic review from a conventional literature review.
Interpret the results of a well-executed systematic review in an effort to answer clinically relevant questions.
